
Last modified: Tue 3/11/97 2215 PST
Assertions may be incrementally incorporated into the Canon of the following kind:
(1) Bird OBJEVT-AFF Fly
(2) Bird SUPSUB-AFF Ostrich
(3) Ostrich OBJEVT-NEG Fly
In conventional logic, (1) & (2) entails that ostriches fly, while (2) & (3) entails that ostriches do not fly and therefore, in conventional logic, (1) & (2) & (3) cannot be true.
The kinds of entailments that follow intuitively from such assertions are termed non-monotonic, and a great deal of research in logic, artificial intelligence and cognitive science has been devoted to the development of schemes for dealing with non-monotonicity in models of human knowledge.