Non-Monotonicity in the Waldzell Canon

A Waldzell Forum Essay [in preparation]

Last modified: Tue 3/11/97 2215 PST


Sources


Notes

Assertions may be incrementally incorporated into the Canon of the following kind:

In conventional logic, (1) & (2) entails that ostriches fly, while (2) & (3) entails that ostriches do not fly and therefore, in conventional logic, (1) & (2) & (3) cannot be true.

The kinds of entailments that follow intuitively from such assertions are termed non-monotonic, and a great deal of research in logic, artificial intelligence and cognitive science has been devoted to the development of schemes for dealing with non-monotonicity in models of human knowledge.


[Waldzell Home Page] [Waldzell Forum]

(c) Copyright 1997 by Mark P. Line <waldzell@pair.com>